Follow us: twitter  RSS

About Save the Mail

We're a team of email protection enthusiasts dedicated to making email better, safer and easier to use.

Here, we cover all things email related.

Send us Feedback, Win a T-shirt!

Save the Mail
McAfee report says: Spam emails killing the environment
Written by Save the Mail!   
Wednesday, 15 April 2009 21:48

While I can’t comment on the science behind McAfee’s study, if it’s to be believed, that would make Sendio the single most eco-friendly anti-spam product on the planet!

Hot off the digital presses… Spam e-mails killing the environment, McAfee report says

McAfee’s Avert Labs recently reported the significant impact that spam is having, not just on our inboxes, but on the environment. The novelty of this angle aside, shouldn’t people be asking themselves how is it possible this problem has been allowed to get so bad? Let’s assume we like the idea of elevating spam to a place where it is considered to be an environmental hazard (I think its even worse — more like an environmental disaster — but the promotion is long overdue), clearly the time has come to ask “who has been asleep at the switch?”

Back in the 1970’s it became obvious that air pollution was caused, to a large extent, by exhaust from automobiles and trucks. Once this fact had been established, the question became… “What are we going to do about it?” If air pollution had been addressed like email pollution, we would have simply trusted the auto manufacturers to make things better. In light of today’s study from McAfee, I think it is safe to say that anti-spam filters = auto manufacturers. While the automobile industry has certainly made great strides in the areas of fuel efficiency and emissions, they have never come close to getting ahead of the curve or actually fixing the problem.

Just like the US auto industry has failed to keep pace, from an innovation perspective, with their competitors around the globe, the developers of anti-spam filtering technologies have, obviously, failed to keep pace with spammers. As Albert Einstein said, “The definition of insanity is doing the same things, over and over again, expecting different results.” Like the US auto industry, the US anti-spam filtering industry is bloated, stuck in the past, is stagnant, and is losing the arms race to the bad guys.

Fortunately for us, the challenge to improve air quality was not simply “trusted,” or handed-over, to the auto industry alone. We realized that individuals needed to get involved. We, the people, needed to make changes to the way we did/do things. We came to understand that to help ourselves we needed to actively engage; not simply sit back and hope some passive system would make everything better.

The time has come, once and for all, for “we the people” to take a stand against spam! Clearly, the mammoth companies, like McAfee, Cisco, Symantec, Google, Barracuda Networks, etc., that make anti-spam filtering tools have failed to save our environment from this polluting scourge. If we, as individuals and collectively as businesses, don’t start looking beyond the status quo with respect to failed anti-spam filtering, we are not only going to loose e-mail as a tool, we are going to hasten the deterioration of our physical environment.

 

0 Comments

2009 Predictions on Email
Written by Save the Mail!   
Monday, 05 January 2009 18:49

You heard it hear first: 2009 is going to be known as the “Year of the Social Networking Scam.”

As more people publish details about themselves on social networking sites, these details are going to be used to generate ever more sophisticated socially engineered phishing attacks. Driven by the difficult economy and increasing unemployment Internet based crime will increase. Individuals and business will seek better tools to protect their respective on-line identities from theft, forgery, and impersonation.

 

0 Comments

Cyber Attacks Cost Businesses an Average of 1.9 Million Dollars Last Year
Written by Save the Mail!   
Thursday, 25 February 2010 19:40

The UK’s Telegraph is reporting that nearly 42% of businesses surveyed for a Symantec security report lost confidential or proprietary data during 2009. And an even higher percentage – 75% of respondents – reported experiencing some type of cyber crime during the last 12 months.

What this boils down to?  An average loss of 1.2 Million Pounds (1.9 Million Dollars) PER COMPANY during 2009.

Financial loss totals were assessed based on a number of factors including lost revenue, loss of customer relationships and damage to their firm’s brand.

While some might find these figures surprising, in light of recent situations some may wonder why the dollar amount wasn’t steeper. Increasingly, these types of events are becoming all too common - and front and center news.

Two of the most prominent (and recent) examples that come to mind are Google and Intel.

On January 12th of this year Google reported that it had been the victim of “sophisticated cyber attacks” that originated from China.  As a result Google threatened to shut-down offices in China and stopped cooperating with Chinese censorship laws.

More recently (this past Tuesday to be exact), Intel announced in a filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission that a “sophisticated [attack] incident” had occurred (around the same time as the attacks on Google).  While no further details were provided on the incident, it’s hard to imagine that no price tag was attached to it if they felt compelled to report it to the SEC.

While these Fortune 500 companies are much larger targets than the majority of companies out there, they’re also clear examples that no organization is immune from attack.  And when attacks occur – they are costly.

Prevention will always be the best form of protection here. Has your organization taken the proper measures to plan for and protect against these types of attacks?  If you haven’t, begin assessing vulnerabilities immediately and put a plan in place to address them.




 

Last Updated on Thursday, 08 April 2010 21:12
 

1 Comment

Email Abuse: Cons, Attacks, Phishes, and oh yes "spam"
Written by Save the Mail!   
Monday, 15 February 2010 23:49

Spam. Lately there has been a great deal of confusion around the term – but here friend of Save the Mail Tim comes to the rescue with some much needed insight on the term, and email abuse in general.

To really dive into where email is at today, we first have to dive into where it all started.  And in the case of email, that’s goes back to the 60s and 70s when an email communications network was assembled for use almost exclusively by research scientists.  The goal of email was simple: get work done – faster & more easily.

But in 1978 one man realized that this network happened to be the target audience for a new product he was selling (a digital mainframe) and he sent an “unsolicited, commercial email” to this entire database.  When Gary Thuerk, “father of spam,” sent this short note out spam was born.

And today, we find our inboxes cluttered with messages, many of which we don’t even want.  But few of these messages are “commercial” in nature.  In fact, increasingly these messages fall into 1 of 3 categories:

  1. A flat out CON (those messages hawking Viagra, fake replica watches, or Canadian pharmaceuticals)
  2. A phishing attempt (those messages trying to obtain personal message via email)
  3. True attack messaging (those messages trying to sneak a Trojan or virus into your system)

Unfortunately, no friendly message from Gary Thuerk in the mix here: it is flat out EMAIL ABUSE. Check out the video above for the whole story.

Over the next few weeks you’ll see more and more of these popping up and we hope you find each of them both interesting and useful (if you don’t – let us know!).  The world of email is growing increasingly complicated and our goal here will be to arm you with the knowledge you need to protect yourself and participate in the conversation.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 00:21
 

0 Comments

Lawyer Awarded $7k in Spam Suit: We do the Math
Written by Save the Mail!   
Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:20

Dan Balsam doesn’t like spam.  In fact, he hates it. Enough so that he went to law school, left a career in marketing and now spends much of his time filing law suits against spammers.

And earlier today he was awarded $7k in a rare court ruling against a spamming organization ($1,000 for every offending email + legal fees).

The unsolicited email Balsam received was from 2007. The spammer (Trancos, Inc.) is now expected to appeal the decision.

When all is said and done here, this begs the question: was it worth it?

 

Let’s do the math:

3 years + Team of Attorneys = $7k – Imminent Appeal + More Legal Fees = No Real Change?

Dan’s website danhatesspam.com warns that “spam is threatening the legitimacy of email as a means for communication” – but we have the feeling that “spam” has already killed the legitimacy of email for Balsam.

His site boasts a no spam policy that warns of $25,000 fees upon his reading of any piece of unsolicited commercial email as well as nine other bullet points littered with legal speak.

The problem here: the real spammers will ignore this.  You might scare off a few friends but the real spammers won’t ever even see it, and will never give Dan a chance to reference it in court either.  

The most dangerous email spam is from sources that will never show-up to a court date – from sources that are not traceable, trackable or suable.

But what he will get: a few thousand dollars out of sloppy – but mostly legitimate – email marketing companies like Trancos (an Inc. magazine fastest growing private company of ’07).

What he won’t get: an end to spam.

Frustrated email consumers like Dan have a right to a spam free inbox, but it shouldn’t have to involve an entirely new career path and a new set of life goals.  Taking back control shouldn’t be this hard.

We don’t need an entire court system to tell us who can and cannot send us an email, we should decide for ourselves.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:18
 

0 Comments

<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 15